Whose Family First? SamoaTel in the Spotlight!
Concerned citizens form CCATS
In response to the multiple inadequacies and unresponsiveness
to public concerns of one of the country’s most important
service providers – SamoaTel – a group of concerned
citizens has formed a support group to raise awareness
of the issues. Citizens’ Coalition for Accountability
in Telecommunications in Samoa (CCATS) begins its campaign
by analyzing one example of SamoaTel’s public rhetoric.
Prototype Rhetoric Riddled with Holes...
Let us start with a recent, short interview of SamoaTel's
CEO, Mr. Michael Johnstone that appeared in Samoa Observer
on July 2 2005 and demonstrate the frivolous statements
and claims made in this seemingly sparkling work of public
relations. This should serve us as a gateway into other
areas of our comprehensive discussion in the months ahead.
First the full article below followed by our point-by-point
comments and critical analyses of subtleties involved:
SamoaTel brings telephone boosters
By Alan Ah Mu 02 July 2005
SamoaTel is close to realising its goal of extending
its telephone network to cover 95 percent of the country. "Very
close," an excited Chief executive officer Michael Johnstone
said. Inaccessible "pockets" in the country, however,
require SamoaTel to come up with different solutions. For
example, Mr Johnstone said an area located at the bottom
of a hill, could make it impossible for a telephone to function.
He refers to those as "marginal signal areas." "And
we're starting to focus on those," he was quick to point
out. In Upolu, such an area is Aleisa. Mr Johnstone said
this is an area that has been crying out for telephones for
years. "Aleisa you will have them," (said) promised
Mr Johnstone. "We have an option coming up for that." He
displayed a booster unit, which is mounted on the wall and
would make telephone calls possible in Aleisa. "It's
like a stereo amplifier," he explained. Another option
for a difficult area, he said, is called a wireless local
loop telephone. It's a telephone with an antennae attached
to it, with a booster inside. "These are all the plans
we are working on," Mr Johnstone said.
We take in account the brief nature of the interview and
the subsequent exclusion of details but the flight of fancy
here is too staggering as not to respond adequately.
Skewed Statistics:
Setting aside the vital issue of the time frame for now,
what is the basis of the stated goal 95 percent "telephone
network coverage" and what does it really refer to?
The internationally accepted yardstick for telephone network
coverage in a country according to FCC (Federal Communication
Comission) and ITU (International Telecommunications Union)
is Teledensity which is defined as the number of landline
telephones in use for every 100 individuals living within
an area. The teledensity for Samoa according to ITU statistics
of 2003 (our latest) is 6.41 which translates to 6.41%
of Samoan population having a telephone line. This percentage
has not drastically changed in recent years. Let's say
that SamoaTel, in good faith (but inconsistent with accepted
reporting practices) multiplied this number by 8 which
is the average household size in Samoa according to the
latest census statistics of 2001. This would give 51% coverage – nowhere
near 95%! Or perhaps, against all conventions of reporting
practices, the 95% network coverage refers to geographic
coverage, in which case we cannot fathom such high percentage
coverage considering the low teledensity and coastal clustering
of Samoan population. Perchance, one might arrive at such
a number (which looks really tantalising!) by lumping all
the so-called “wireless local loop”, radio
phones, mobile and pay phone access and referring to their
potentialities to cover 95% of Samoa - again misleading
statistics. Why does SamoaTel twist simple facts in such
a drastic way - we ask?
“Inaccessible” – by what?
Which part of Samoa is really inaccessible - by what and
by whom? Samoa is a relatively small country of less than
3,000 square kilometers and the two main islands are relatively
close to each other. Samoa boats a topography and clusters
of population so ideal for implementing telecommunications
infrastructures that is almost the subject of envy for
any network engineer elsewhere. With a 100% network digitisation
and an extensive state-of-the-art fiber optic cable around
both islands and across Upolu, Samoa’s telecommunications
infrastructure is much ahead of its current international
classification as an LDC (Least Developed Country). Many
communities alongside and close to the cable back-bone
enjoy the benefit of landline telephone for voice and data
(fax/internet) communication - albeit via a small number
of telephone installations. From this main fibre-optic
line, connections can be extended to service communities
further away. With the small distances, good road network
and easy topography, these areas are certainly not inaccessible
by ordinary landline – there is no technical barrier
to SamoaTel extending its landline network for the “plain
old telephone system” (POTS). In the case of Aleisa,
the area mentioned in the article, an extension of only
a few miles would be required. Later articles will examine
the financial viability of such an investment for SamoaTel.
“Wireless Local Loop” a.k.a. HomeZone
The
so-called “Wireless Local Loop” a.k.a. HomeZone
is simply a GSM mobile (voice only) network. Because of a
ten-year no-compete agreement with Telecom Samoa Cellular,
SamoaTel cannot market this as a mobile service – thus
the disguise as “Wireless Local Loop” (which
is entirely a different concept by definition) and branding
as HomeZone. This system is used in some parts of the country
not reached by the landline telephone network, to provide
a voice-only telephone service which has its own billing
system and structure, different from the ordinary (PSTN)
system.
By mentioning so-called “inaccessible pockets”,
the above mentioned article is obviously making a reference
to the Wireless Local Loop network and the fact that the
HomeZone service does not work in some areas. The reason
for this is that there are not enough towers to provide adequate
coverage (to be exact, there is only one tower!) – not
because of any inherent difficulties of the areas concerned.
The so-called “boosters” (which are not boosters
at all but mere Fixed GSM Cellular Terminals), acquired by
SamoaTel at high cost, and provided to a very small number
of people may have improved their signal reception, but have
not overcome the multitude of other problems associated with
this product (more on these in a future article). Given the
difficulties providing service to such areas via “Wireless
Local Loop” technology, the obvious question is: why
not extend the landline? Is it perhaps because of a short-sighted
economical equation by SamoaTel to keep the captive and desperate
audience in these "inaccessible pockets on the bottom
of the hill" in order to have a large and instant customer
base when the new GSM network rolls out next year? Clearly
neither of these services is an adequate substitute for true
landline service with fax and internet capability in addition
to voice, and at equal rates as the rest of the country.
What is good for Apia shall be good for Falealupo too, the
classic motto and vision of the Government.
Aleisa – so close, and yet so far
It
is no accident that Aleisa was mentioned in the above article.
It appeared a few days after Mr. Johnstone received
a letter from an Aleisa resident as a matter requesting to
meet and discuss the status of landline telephone services
to Aleisa while outlining in great detail the multitudes
of service and billing problems of the HomeZone product.
While the meeting followed a week later, and repeated by
another Aleisa resident shortly after, no results were achieved
nor were any problems fixed – the only outcome being
a clear answer that there were no plans to bring landline
telephone services to Aleisa.
A highly populated and developed area, Aleisa is home to
mostly private land/home-owners comprised of professionals,
entrepreneurs, farmers, and many businesses. The most recent
national census indicates that Aleisa's population is over
1,200 with a conservative estimate of at least 3,000 people
living in the surrounding area between Tanumapua and Faleasi'u-uta
(this does not include villages on the other side towards
Lefaga, such as Tanumalala). There are also two sizable subdivisions
in Aleisa. This region, North-West Upolu, is the fastest-growing
in Samoa. Aleisa residents have persistently petitioned SamoaTel
for landline telephone services for the past 8 years (with
over 200 names on the most recent list submitted), to no
avail.
Too expensive?
SamoaTel staff at all levels
are quick to point out how expensive it is to extend telephone
lines. This may seem
reasonable until you realize that we are not in outback Australia.
Only a 10-15 minute drive from Apia, with a number of tar-sealed
roads to the coast, Aleisa is only 4.7 miles away from the
main fiber optics cable (DSS). Extending only two 100-pair
copper cables would provide for over one thousand telephone
lines at relatively low cost. And doesn’t it seem likely
that an area full of business-people crying out for landline
telephone service for voice, facsimile and email communication
would generate some healthy revenue for SamoaTel, and maybe
even make it worthwhile to invest in the line extension?
And in the event that it took some time to turn a profit – isn’t
that what Community Service Obligation funding is for?
All of these questions are difficult, but the public should
not be fobbed off with easy answers, e.g. high roll-out cost,
technical impossibility, SamoaTel not eligible for CSO, etc.,
and now the latest, official puny excuse of the low number
of applications for phone received from Aleisa residents.
With a petition of over 200 residents in Aleisa for landline
telephone service one can hardly speak of low turnout! In
later articles we will expound on the application process,
past and present, and the fact that the number of applicants
has not been shown to be a trigger for extending landline
phone services to an area. (How many normal people would
go through the difficult process of lodging an official application
when they know very well that there is no service in their
area?)
The fact remains that requests to initiate a feasibility,
revenue and cost analysis study for bringing landline services
to Aleisa have fallen on deaf ears and repeated follow-up
letters have remained unanswered by SamoaTel. So, what is
the basis of all these excuses?
CCATS conclusions
Amazing how a very short and seemingly jolly article can
contain so much misinformation. We started our public awareness
campaign by analysing this short article to stress upon the
public that an acute sense of critical thinking is in order
when dealing with SamoaTel - this applies to their public
relations campaigns, their media advertising, new services
or technology hypes, and as we shall see in the weeks and
months to come, their billing inconsistencies, service provisioning
and a host of other issues.
In the meantime, we encourage you to visit our website (www.CCATSamoa.info),
launched this weekend which should serve as a repository
of published articles and a chance to voice your concerns
or share your experiences - or perhaps you have some kind
words to convince SamoaTel to help and provide the Aleisa
area and other disadvantaged areas with equal level of service.
About Us
Citizens’ Coalition for Accountability in Telecommunications
in Samoa (CCATS) is a non-partisan coalition of concerned
Samoans. What we intend to accomplish is to provide public
awareness on all the issues that adversely affect Samoans
relating to telecommunications services provided by SamoaTel.
We do so, in good faith and with the understanding that Samoa
deserves better and with a deep conviction that an informed
society is a better place to thrive and flourish. We base
our observations and findings on verifiable facts and attempt
to layout our arguments to the public at large and to those
in decision making positions with restrained logic, factual
data and common sense. For the sake of brevity and for the
purpose of reaching a broad base of readers we attempt to
keep the technical jargon to a minimum. The public awareness
campaign we are launching using all available media, commencing
with this article, will continue as long as SamoaTel's inadequacies
persist. While we like to assume representation of the spectrum
of the concerned community at large, an expert team amidst
us, comprised of international consultants in areas of telecommunications,
management, finance and policy making is ready to take actions
to higher levels. It is our ardent hope and aspiration that
this campaign triggers SamoaTel to rectify its multitudes
of problems for its own sake but most importantly for the
benefit of Samoa as whole.
|